Lawsuit against New Jersey, Delaware PA.,tri-state area caseworker(s) are being won. You're going to have to continue to also study up on Absolute/Qualified Immunity.It is the first thing a liable no good caseworker, who hurt you,violated you, allow your child to be sexually abused, under state supervision,or physical,emotionally abused, choked, bullied, hurt in such foster care, shall run and attempt to hide behind to avoid paying you damages, being found liable..LEARN as much as you're able and stay focus while doing so when suing pro-se without a lawyer pro-se DFS,DCPP,CYS,DYFS,DCF.
Qualified Immunity has to be pierced, in order to move forward for your damages everyone. When you're suing without or with a lawyer, such is clear. You're able to learn as our founder and her severely injured daughter's were all able to do effectively(pro-se)no lawyer. Law school implementation is the mother's sole focus, for years, in California,NJ,DE.,PA,NY,NC and know that most worker's have been found liable(in more recent time, than not)and this, as experts with our unique astute, effective consulting positive network agree, by citing, "the more suits against such agency/and or the individual cps employees, it shall God-Willing bring a much needed change.and you're to read more below,(prior to calling to begin your 1-on -1) our busy effective help/hotline. Thank you ... 1-929-277-7848.
"The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known."
Pearson v. Callahan, 129 S. Ct. 808,815 (2009)
A right is clearly established when:
"the contours of the right are sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right."
Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 640 (1987).
"The question is whether a reasonable public official would know that his or her specific conduct violated clearly established rights." Grant v. City of Pittsburgh, 98 F.3d 116, 121 (3d Cir. 1996).
Qualified immunity, thus, protects government officials from liability for "mere mistakes"in judgment.
Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 479 (1978).
It is up to the Court to decide whether the facts alleged, taken in the light most favorable to the party asserting injury, show a violation of a constitutional right and whether that right is clearly established. Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194,201 (2001).