E-Learning 1-on-1 POWER session over @ the nation's 1st student-1-on-1 e-learning POWERHOUSE WOMEN E-LawStudentConsulting Research Specialist and Advocate pro-se civil rights support ctr., for (only the truly violated)who are suing in CALIFORNIA pro per/self file DCFS social worker,caseworker, to ARIZONA,DE.,NY,PA.,WA.,VA.,NC,and nationwide ext. 806
Jury shall hear the truth....and nothing but.
Ext. 806
As seen on FB, to You tube, other sites, BOOKS(thank you for such purchase)on such books, inspiring so many, it is now at the point of such lawsuit where (not all public)but the owner S.MELENDEZ is now at the settlement talks stage, she did it! Was able to convince such court(federal) that her suit deserved to be heard,and move forward and the judge AGREED. 1-929-277-7848. Ext. 7447
---
Whether from her NYC Tri-state Area(Suburban STATEN ISLAND,NY to Suburban NJ) you're having many sadly, who do not "get it." She never did, til' it happened to her. She informed, our boss news media in NYC NJ for years, "When you're attempting to violate one's constitutional right? Prepare to be held ACCOUNTABLE, from those who clearly:
TALKING ABOUT IT= NO ACTION. Bemoaning(complaining) online, or leaving "post about it?" That's not action.
CRYING ON FACEBOOK ABOUT IT? = No positive action.
-LEARNING THE LAW/LEARNING IT INSIDE OUT while suing PRO-SE SELF FILE(correctly)AND timely=#WINNING.
Below is the most recent update. Good luck to all 'wisely' learning, taking pre-requisite action when suing timely per violation, cps. Ext. 7080
Media has verified, our boss lawsuit for millions have WON. (won the right to see it move forward to settlement talks.) THIS is an example, of 'HOW to sue cps, pro-se by deadline, when you're being clearly violated, but your "public pretender) (a lawyer who pretend to care or hired paid counsel,isn't "caring about you enough do what is right, and or sue.) remember, like our boss? #YOU ARE CAPABLE. . . Ext. 7080
-
Such highly-publicize suit involving 2 little suburban girls, making news headlines east coast.
The facts are for years public.
YOU DECIDE our many viewers, daily supported and we thank you for weighing-in where a caseworker clear engage in acts unbecoming to a state employee,experts in CALIFORNIA TO NYC,NJ DE,tri-state agree,
from all walks of life for years...
Ext. 806
As seen on FB, to You tube, other sites, BOOKS(thank you for such purchase)on such books, inspiring so many, it is now at the point of such lawsuit where (not all public)but the owner S.MELENDEZ is now at the settlement talks stage, she did it! Was able to convince such court(federal) that her suit deserved to be heard,and move forward and the judge AGREED. 1-929-277-7848. Ext. 7447
---
Whether from her NYC Tri-state Area(Suburban STATEN ISLAND,NY to Suburban NJ) you're having many sadly, who do not "get it." She never did, til' it happened to her. She informed, our boss news media in NYC NJ for years, "When you're attempting to violate one's constitutional right? Prepare to be held ACCOUNTABLE, from those who clearly:
- Know the law. Simple as that. STOP MAKING EXCUSES and learn and learn from those who already WON at the level YOU have not. Ext. 7447
- LEARNED the law 24hrs. a day, loss of eat, loss of sleep, because they knew what NEEDED to be done, that no high priced attorney(ever)cared enough to do. #FIGHTING for what is right ,became boss melendez motto.
TALKING ABOUT IT= NO ACTION. Bemoaning(complaining) online, or leaving "post about it?" That's not action.
CRYING ON FACEBOOK ABOUT IT? = No positive action.
-LEARNING THE LAW/LEARNING IT INSIDE OUT while suing PRO-SE SELF FILE(correctly)AND timely=#WINNING.
Below is the most recent update. Good luck to all 'wisely' learning, taking pre-requisite action when suing timely per violation, cps. Ext. 7080
Media has verified, our boss lawsuit for millions have WON. (won the right to see it move forward to settlement talks.) THIS is an example, of 'HOW to sue cps, pro-se by deadline, when you're being clearly violated, but your "public pretender) (a lawyer who pretend to care or hired paid counsel,isn't "caring about you enough do what is right, and or sue.) remember, like our boss? #YOU ARE CAPABLE. . . Ext. 7080
-
Such highly-publicize suit involving 2 little suburban girls, making news headlines east coast.
The facts are for years public.
YOU DECIDE our many viewers, daily supported and we thank you for weighing-in where a caseworker clear engage in acts unbecoming to a state employee,experts in CALIFORNIA TO NYC,NJ DE,tri-state agree,
from all walks of life for years...
Now,
Our highest court(s)of our land, moreover, importantly our U.S.Supreme Court has carved out exceptions insofar as Qualified Immunity/Absolute Immunity(Protection from paying out money damages$$$ for victims injured by a state employee who has violated the United States Constitutional Right of a family, a child's 4th Amendment Constitutional Right et.al, and many of these most warranted lawsuits, filed in the U.S.District(federal)Court are being won,have been won,and ergo, shall continue.
Good luck to ALL #trulyinnocent suing abhorrent incompetent caseworker's @ CPS.
1-929-277-7848 Ext.806
EXT. 920 Help Form?
Click here.(or go to home/front page to fill out accordingly.)
9th and 3rd Circuit,
currently at bar:
Two more analogous cases involving:
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT filed by the defense.
Both cases in NJ and California once again are similar
Re:
Social workers are seeking to be immuned from:
1.)Withholding exculpatory evidence involving such worker who knowingly withheld crucial information insofar as a child in state care,and under state DCF/DCFS supervision.
2.) Perjury to a material fact.
3.)Materially misleading statements, knowingly involving a child's well being while under state supervision once removed from his home(Boy now is of age)California and the girl is now of age in (NJ) EXT.920
____________________
Such lawyer(s)in both states, agree of the similarities to the winning case involving Deanna Hartwick-Fogarty where her two teen daughters,were removed,given to an ex spouse. The DCFS employees:
- Lied under oath.
-Perjury was clear.
-Kept from the judge crucial facts concerning the children when it was known to the agency and or its individual workers the entire time.
____________________
Let's take a look at today the current case involving our very own leader-staff member, and FOUNDER/OWNER of the nation's 1st pro-se winning expertise consulting educational ctr., of its kind, for those suing by deadline(pro-se,self file CPS employee et.al., ) 929-277-7848.
The current case at bar for money damages, per civil right,constitutional federally-protected violations, in the 3rd Cir; Division employees, for #dcpp #DCF has submitted statements, affidavit(s)false information, file that had knowingly contained materially misleading and material omissions. Sufficient evidence to support an "inference" that such employees for New Jersey Child Protection agency the "Division Youth Family/Protection & Permanency DCF,their individual employees clearly acted with, an improper motive.
When such set of facts, evidence et.al., is analyzed for such purposed known as "RULE 56" the record shall supports, experts agree such inference, an inference that the defendants withheld,suppressed knowingly, willfully,and or gross-negligence et.al., that such defendants withheld information regarding the child's well-being in state supervision and care for years, while replacing such truthfulness with materially misleading disclosures, and material omissions,to simply deprive the mother of her constitutional,fundamental right to continue to raise her children, and have deprived the child her right to be free of such harm for years, and to deprive the child her constitutional right to be home with her own mother.
The record shall support(when a sound-mind, reasonable-jury hears such lawsuit case) shall support the state workers, knew, and or should have known, to turn over the evidence, suggesting and supporting such truthfulness insofar as but not limited to;
1.)CHILD brutally gang-rape/assaulted for some time while the caseworker hid it from court for as long as 4 to five months.
2.)Child sexually abused, while she was also prior abused in the home to where a caseworker AGREED she need to be placed.
3.)CHILD MOLESTATION/CHOKE while living in a state-DCF-contracted facility,while in court(same year)DCPP said child is "fine."
4.)DANGEROUS PSYCHOTROPIC dangerous meds et.al., for years since only age 10/11 years young,that are linked to suicide etc.
5.)Child imploring to go home to mommie, while caseworker lied again to court citing the complete antithesis intentionally.
6.)Child missing. Child factually was indeed, lost in the system. The same system that was suppose to protect such girls.
7.)Child mother was cleared early on the day in question,the week in question, of abuse. State was not even able to prove neglect, let alone child abuse. State worker buried report.Child shall prove it,with their own documentation at such trial,along with child shall prove indeed the caseworker,not 1 but several submitted false information to deprive child the right to return home, with mom,for almost shockingly a decade.(Knowing entire time the mom was innocent,from the outset everyone.)
Ext.806
8.)The child was not doing well nor "thriving" as the state individual employees were citing per family court hearing.
9.)Child gone missing and the police dept., were not once but "repeatedly"searching for the missing child. [FACT]
10.)Child cross state-lines at the time and was brutally assaulted.[F A C T]
12.)Child was in school. [FACT]
13.)Child was living with her father, yet the record shall establish, and as such experts agree, from california to Boss NYC area NJ area, is quite substantial./significant at Summary Judgement and Trial:
-Child was living not at one,but several multi-group/foster homes for years,and ENTIRE time was under DCF supervision.
-Caseworker called the child a liar.
-Child caseworker(s)refer to such severely injured child "pathological" who is not to be trusted and or how the child and parent, simply can't be believed at any time. (This is what such expert said during multi-discussions with the injured plaintiff et.al.,
that a jury will "gasp," while doing what is right in the U.S.District Federal Court,everyone ...
Ext. 806
Caseworker(s) also were inconsistent with each + every lawsuit deposition taken, while adding on knowingly more lies, throughout entire deposition, under oath.
Blaming(during the family court phase) the child for each + every serious injury the child sustained while under state supervision,shocking the conscience of all experts coast-to-coast."
When you're suing for such damages everyone, M.T.D.(Motion to Dismiss) then Summary Judgement is significant,so make note of that...
---
Plaintiff cite countervailing evidence insofar as proving how ineffective,incompetent such caseworker's are in the founder's case. Such depositions also shall prove to a jury how worker's at the time, ( & highly supportive of child's 4th amendment huge claim) that there were at least 1/2 of dozen worker's who knew, at the time there was absolutely incontrovertibly no imminency; no exigent circumstances, no imminent danger & no serious injuries AS NEEDED when you're taking a little girl at only 10 and 7 years young, into STATE CUSTODY, without:
1.)Notifying the CUSTODIAL parent.
2.)No DUE PROCESS as by law, required,and clearly-established.
-
_________________________________________
The child's significant 4th amendment claim is as experts call it coast-to-coast collateral. and shall win @ such summary judgement premise on:
Let's say for arguement sake everyone:
Caseworker goes to see a child.
The caseworker then memorialize what took place,and interviews such parties(around the child) and the children.
The caseworker goes and interview parent, (weeks later) 14 days.
________________________________________________
Even if, the DEFENSE, at trial(experts predict) shall invoke the false fact that, "Well, the child says this, and the child said that, his arguement shall fail for the defendant, premise on the CASEWORKER duties are not in any way unclear, along with the law involving federal, state et.al., policies in place involving such cases, are not in any way unclear. Hence, you can't explain away at jury trial and or at summary judgement KEY points and that they are:
1.)Child was seen. [FACT]
2.Child was healthy,alert,playing,happy,and not at any risk of danger. [Written in a withheld (by cps) such lengthy multi-page internal (later to be discovered) DCPP,DYFS report, by their OWN defendants!] [FACT]
_________________________________________________
Caseworker cites:
Based on the investigation,AFTER speaking to the children and the parent, DYFS(DCPP,DCF) can't substantiate abuse, and or even neglect,by mom.[FACT] 4.[Another caseworker same night/day, "i'm going home."Supervisor @ NJ DCPP approved for the caseworker first on the scene to simply go HOME.
_________________________
DCF assigned caseworker(multiple) didn't need to even go talk to mom. Didn't even need to investigate/interview mom immediate.No need. Cops and the DCPP employee already agreed, NO ABUSE/NO NEGLECT from mom. [End Quote]
Summary Judgement allows you, the non-moving party(meaning the plaintiff) who is seeking damages and accountability et.al., against the Department Children Families et.al., to move forward for damages(trial)by jury.
________________________
We will keep all of our many visitors/supporters and viewer's posted as both lawsuit(s) continue to do well and reach such final conclusion this year in 2017-2018, and we thank all who are praying for the owner @ WON ext. 806 Ms.Melendez,
who continue to motivate, encourage throughout, to educate,and empower,per requested 1-on-1 POWER session, while you're gearing up to sue as she astutely and prudently has done and her daughter's, as yourself are getting ready to exercise your rights as an American and sue when violated by #DCF #DCFS #CPS
1-929-277-7848.
Click here, to implement the required help form.
currently at bar:
Two more analogous cases involving:
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT filed by the defense.
Both cases in NJ and California once again are similar
Re:
Social workers are seeking to be immuned from:
1.)Withholding exculpatory evidence involving such worker who knowingly withheld crucial information insofar as a child in state care,and under state DCF/DCFS supervision.
2.) Perjury to a material fact.
3.)Materially misleading statements, knowingly involving a child's well being while under state supervision once removed from his home(Boy now is of age)California and the girl is now of age in (NJ) EXT.920
____________________
Such lawyer(s)in both states, agree of the similarities to the winning case involving Deanna Hartwick-Fogarty where her two teen daughters,were removed,given to an ex spouse. The DCFS employees:
- Lied under oath.
-Perjury was clear.
-Kept from the judge crucial facts concerning the children when it was known to the agency and or its individual workers the entire time.
____________________
Let's take a look at today the current case involving our very own leader-staff member, and FOUNDER/OWNER of the nation's 1st pro-se winning expertise consulting educational ctr., of its kind, for those suing by deadline(pro-se,self file CPS employee et.al., ) 929-277-7848.
The current case at bar for money damages, per civil right,constitutional federally-protected violations, in the 3rd Cir; Division employees, for #dcpp #DCF has submitted statements, affidavit(s)false information, file that had knowingly contained materially misleading and material omissions. Sufficient evidence to support an "inference" that such employees for New Jersey Child Protection agency the "Division Youth Family/Protection & Permanency DCF,their individual employees clearly acted with, an improper motive.
When such set of facts, evidence et.al., is analyzed for such purposed known as "RULE 56" the record shall supports, experts agree such inference, an inference that the defendants withheld,suppressed knowingly, willfully,and or gross-negligence et.al., that such defendants withheld information regarding the child's well-being in state supervision and care for years, while replacing such truthfulness with materially misleading disclosures, and material omissions,to simply deprive the mother of her constitutional,fundamental right to continue to raise her children, and have deprived the child her right to be free of such harm for years, and to deprive the child her constitutional right to be home with her own mother.
The record shall support(when a sound-mind, reasonable-jury hears such lawsuit case) shall support the state workers, knew, and or should have known, to turn over the evidence, suggesting and supporting such truthfulness insofar as but not limited to;
1.)CHILD brutally gang-rape/assaulted for some time while the caseworker hid it from court for as long as 4 to five months.
2.)Child sexually abused, while she was also prior abused in the home to where a caseworker AGREED she need to be placed.
3.)CHILD MOLESTATION/CHOKE while living in a state-DCF-contracted facility,while in court(same year)DCPP said child is "fine."
4.)DANGEROUS PSYCHOTROPIC dangerous meds et.al., for years since only age 10/11 years young,that are linked to suicide etc.
5.)Child imploring to go home to mommie, while caseworker lied again to court citing the complete antithesis intentionally.
6.)Child missing. Child factually was indeed, lost in the system. The same system that was suppose to protect such girls.
7.)Child mother was cleared early on the day in question,the week in question, of abuse. State was not even able to prove neglect, let alone child abuse. State worker buried report.Child shall prove it,with their own documentation at such trial,along with child shall prove indeed the caseworker,not 1 but several submitted false information to deprive child the right to return home, with mom,for almost shockingly a decade.(Knowing entire time the mom was innocent,from the outset everyone.)
Ext.806
8.)The child was not doing well nor "thriving" as the state individual employees were citing per family court hearing.
9.)Child gone missing and the police dept., were not once but "repeatedly"searching for the missing child. [FACT]
10.)Child cross state-lines at the time and was brutally assaulted.[F A C T]
12.)Child was in school. [FACT]
13.)Child was living with her father, yet the record shall establish, and as such experts agree, from california to Boss NYC area NJ area, is quite substantial./significant at Summary Judgement and Trial:
-Child was living not at one,but several multi-group/foster homes for years,and ENTIRE time was under DCF supervision.
-Caseworker called the child a liar.
-Child caseworker(s)refer to such severely injured child "pathological" who is not to be trusted and or how the child and parent, simply can't be believed at any time. (This is what such expert said during multi-discussions with the injured plaintiff et.al.,
that a jury will "gasp," while doing what is right in the U.S.District Federal Court,everyone ...
Ext. 806
Caseworker(s) also were inconsistent with each + every lawsuit deposition taken, while adding on knowingly more lies, throughout entire deposition, under oath.
Blaming(during the family court phase) the child for each + every serious injury the child sustained while under state supervision,shocking the conscience of all experts coast-to-coast."
When you're suing for such damages everyone, M.T.D.(Motion to Dismiss) then Summary Judgement is significant,so make note of that...
---
Plaintiff cite countervailing evidence insofar as proving how ineffective,incompetent such caseworker's are in the founder's case. Such depositions also shall prove to a jury how worker's at the time, ( & highly supportive of child's 4th amendment huge claim) that there were at least 1/2 of dozen worker's who knew, at the time there was absolutely incontrovertibly no imminency; no exigent circumstances, no imminent danger & no serious injuries AS NEEDED when you're taking a little girl at only 10 and 7 years young, into STATE CUSTODY, without:
1.)Notifying the CUSTODIAL parent.
2.)No DUE PROCESS as by law, required,and clearly-established.
-
_________________________________________
The child's significant 4th amendment claim is as experts call it coast-to-coast collateral. and shall win @ such summary judgement premise on:
Let's say for arguement sake everyone:
Caseworker goes to see a child.
The caseworker then memorialize what took place,and interviews such parties(around the child) and the children.
The caseworker goes and interview parent, (weeks later) 14 days.
________________________________________________
Even if, the DEFENSE, at trial(experts predict) shall invoke the false fact that, "Well, the child says this, and the child said that, his arguement shall fail for the defendant, premise on the CASEWORKER duties are not in any way unclear, along with the law involving federal, state et.al., policies in place involving such cases, are not in any way unclear. Hence, you can't explain away at jury trial and or at summary judgement KEY points and that they are:
1.)Child was seen. [FACT]
2.Child was healthy,alert,playing,happy,and not at any risk of danger. [Written in a withheld (by cps) such lengthy multi-page internal (later to be discovered) DCPP,DYFS report, by their OWN defendants!] [FACT]
_________________________________________________
Caseworker cites:
Based on the investigation,AFTER speaking to the children and the parent, DYFS(DCPP,DCF) can't substantiate abuse, and or even neglect,by mom.[FACT] 4.[Another caseworker same night/day, "i'm going home."Supervisor @ NJ DCPP approved for the caseworker first on the scene to simply go HOME.
_________________________
DCF assigned caseworker(multiple) didn't need to even go talk to mom. Didn't even need to investigate/interview mom immediate.No need. Cops and the DCPP employee already agreed, NO ABUSE/NO NEGLECT from mom. [End Quote]
Summary Judgement allows you, the non-moving party(meaning the plaintiff) who is seeking damages and accountability et.al., against the Department Children Families et.al., to move forward for damages(trial)by jury.
________________________
We will keep all of our many visitors/supporters and viewer's posted as both lawsuit(s) continue to do well and reach such final conclusion this year in 2017-2018, and we thank all who are praying for the owner @ WON ext. 806 Ms.Melendez,
who continue to motivate, encourage throughout, to educate,and empower,per requested 1-on-1 POWER session, while you're gearing up to sue as she astutely and prudently has done and her daughter's, as yourself are getting ready to exercise your rights as an American and sue when violated by #DCF #DCFS #CPS
1-929-277-7848.
Click here, to implement the required help form.